July 2008

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31    

« Buzzword alert: De-portalization | Between the Lines | ZDNet.com | Main | Microsoft Knowledge Network Changes Direction »

December 10, 2006

Windows Presence Platform?

In the "thinking out loud" category: Microsoft's Windows RSS Platform is an innovative approach to the problem of XML syndication. It provides a common integration point with differing levels of integration. It becomes a policy enforcement point for security, network management and so on. It helps provide a generalized platform mechanism for all applications to ensure a consistent user experience. It's not a perfect play by Microsoft (the Outlook team for instance seems to be building a somewhat redundant capability and the platform is essentially a V1 technology), but it will help establish generalized client infrastructure for XML syndication.

So why not duplicate this approach for presence? Let's call it the "Windows Presence Platform". Such a platform would provide a common set of client interfaces that multiple "watchers" could report into, with varying levels of integration from basic presence awareness to more complex presence based on a variety of activities and situations. It would also allow for non-SIP based applications to interact in a consistent fasion without having to know the nuances of the presence system itself (in fact, a Windows Presence Platform might support a variety of protocol integration points. It would not require Office Communicator to be on the machine at all so other types of client-front ends could virally take off.

Again, just food for thought without a lot of technical foundation, but I think the model could work (a headless presence client aggregator). 

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/t/trackback/18132/7102159

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Windows Presence Platform?:

Comments

Add a Windows Calendar Platform, for scheduling policy across the other services you mention, and we'd be cooking with gas.

Mike, the idea of a presence aggregator is a good one but I believe that the client desktop is the last place that this functionality should be implemented.

Surely this makes far more sense as a service that exists in the Internet cloud with open interfaces that let multiple devices and services interact with it.

Post a comment

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In